Sign up

Login to BooksLIVE

Forgotten password?

Forgotten your password?

Enter your username or email address and we'll send you reset instructions

Books LIVE

BooksLIVESA

@flavorpill unveils list of 10 YA books that "scarred us for life": http://t.co/tclZVKlQ

Duelling Phytoids! Drew Forrest and John Young on Bob Woolmer's Art and Science of Cricket

Bob Woolmer's Art and Science of CricketWho on Earth is Helen Moffett? That’s what Deputy Editor of the Mail & Guardian Drew Forrest wants to know – and he won’t be satisfied with Bob Woolmer’s Art and Science of Cricket until he finds out.

Forrest’s displeasure with several less-than-instantly-apparent details to do with the book formed into a little ball of bile in the pit of his stomach as he read it – which bile he then regurgitated in the form of a stick on the pages of his newspaper. I’m sure Ms Moffett will be able to answer his quibbles point by point – have at ‘em, Helen!

Meanwhile, Forrest’s stick is counter-balanced by a whopping great gold-plated carrot* from a certain John Young, who starts off, one senses, with more knowledge of Woolmer and his life’s passion than Forrest did, and who counts, among the elements which make the book a true all-rounder, “the lucid writing of Helen Moffet”:

The foreword claims that Bob Woolmer had just finished writing this weighty tome when he died during last year’s Cricket World Cup. The spine is more equivocal, giving the joint authors as Woolmer, sports scientist Tim Noakes and someone called Helen Moffett.

While reading, the questions constantly came to mind: how many of these 642 pages did Woolmer in fact contribute and to what extent is this really his account of the “art and science” of cricket?

The reader’s unease is heightened by the repeated references to him in the third person and the fact that some of the anecdotes — notably one by Moffet about Pakistani players pumping themselves up before play — did not come from his pen.

In an interview Bob Woolmer once said he was puzzled when he heard former players saying they wanted to put something back into the game. “I would go further,” he said. “I would like to add something to the game.”

The scope of Woolmer’s Art and Science of Cricket shows just how much he added.

This is a big book. Within its 656 pages, Woolmer and his fellow authors have covered every conceivable aspect of the game of cricket. The selected bibliography provides evidence of extensive research. Thankfully there is a detailed index, which makes navigation very easy.

The navigation reference is appropriate in a broader sense, because this is a great ocean of a book, big in ambition and big, too, in the sense that it is an important book.

Book Details

* Moffett’s phrase, lest I be accused of plagiarism!

 

Recent comments:

  • <a href="http://karinamagdalenaszczurek.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Karina</a>
    Karina
    October 8th, 2008 @15:48 #
     
    Top

    If one of these is a carrot - what are all theses sticks doing here?

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Ben - Editor</a>
    Ben - Editor
    October 8th, 2008 @16:18 #
     
    Top

    Sticks? What sticks? I only see one stick. :)

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://helenmoffett.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Helen</a>
    Helen
    October 8th, 2008 @17:16 #
     
    Top

    Right, here goes. This is the 1st time I've read Forrest's piece, altho folk have been calling me to condole on his "snide" piece all week. Reading it, I first felt sorry for the guy, who was obviously writing a very tough deadline, and who didn't have time to read about me on the back cover of the book, Google me (most of my cricketing credentials would have popped up) or visit the book website - http://www.bobwoolmerbook.com">BobWoolmerBook.com which tells the story of how the book was written, who wrote what, etc. (It's a fascinating story -- check it out.)

    He also doesn't seem to grasp that if one of the authors of a jointly authored book dies before it's published, it rules out using "We..." as the authorial voice -- er, what tense would follow? So what we did was to refer to all three authors -- Bob, Tim and myself -- in the 3rd person (any reader doing more than paging through would have spotted this). This also solved the problem that we brought very different experiences to the book: Tim and I didn't play test cricket, or coach international Test teams; Bob and I didn't conduct research on Peter Kirsten's visual reflexes, etc; Bob and Tim didn't interview Wasim and Huma Akram with me, or join me at Sandy Gordon's workshop on his experiences as a psychologist working with the Aussie team. And so on.

    But I didn't get cross until I got to the bit about the "legitimate suspicion that Bob wrote only a narrowly focused coaching manual while others [i.e. me] cashed in" on the interest generated by his death. Um, that's exactly why we put up the website, so that readers could be reassured that the book is what Bob wanted, and signed off on (I have the galleys he signed off, complete with his handwritten changes -- almost none -- and yes, they include all the "esoterica" I was supposed to have added after his death. This also implies that Tim Noakes -- one of Bob's closest friends -- and Bob's widow and sons would have played along with this kind of carpetbagging. Very tacky.

    But what really made me see red -- because it suggests bloody LAZY journalism -- was the trotting out of the famous story about Eddo Brandes's chirp to Glenn McGrath about fucking his wife. Of course Bob knew that story. He would NEVER have allowed it in a book that he wanted parents, children and religious cricket lovers to read (the man coached Pakistan, for Pete's sake). But that's not what has steam coming from my ears; if Drew Forrest knew anything about cricket, he'd know that at the time we were putting the cricket MS to bed, Jane McGrath was losing her long and brave battle against terminal cancer. That's why Glenn McGrath retired when he did -- helloooo?? The M&G ran a piece on her death only three months ago!! Jeeeshh. Read your own rag, Mr Forrest. Tacky AND sloppy.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://rustumkozain.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Rustum Kozain</a>
    Rustum Kozain
    October 8th, 2008 @18:21 #
     
    Top

    Ouch, wouldn't want to cross you Helen. I just took a bit of a squizz at the book site - it's a great site: design and navigation. Wish more sites could be like that.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://rustumkozain.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Rustum Kozain</a>
    Rustum Kozain
    October 8th, 2008 @18:32 #
     
    Top

    By the way, Helen, the link in your comment is wonky. Also, don't know whether BookSA has previously linked to the carrot at Cricinfo:

    http://content-www.cricinfo.com/ci/content/story/351008.html

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Ben - Editor</a>
    Ben - Editor
    October 8th, 2008 @18:57 #
     
    Top

    Fixed that link, Rustum.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://helenmoffett.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Helen</a>
    Helen
    October 8th, 2008 @19:06 #
     
    Top

    Thanks, guys! Isn't the website for the cricket book great? Wouldn't it wonderful if all our books got sites like that? (Sigh.) Rustum, it's quite safe to cross me -- what brings me out in Medusa mode is professional laziness, stupidity, mendacity, nastiness for the sake of it and unwarranted attacks on the innocent. Steer clear of all those (you already do :)) and you have nothing to fear!

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://lepageblog.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">David</a>
    David
    October 8th, 2008 @22:59 #
     
    Top

    Well, for heaven's sakes, Helen, a rejoinder published on the Book SA site and read by 12 people is NOT A REJOINDER, nor justice swift and terrible, and Forest remains standing, neither quivering nor moved; please tell me you've written to the M&G? Why rely on something slow and stately from Struik? Dip into your Alex Borraine book on the TRC, and see what Madiba told him when he was under attack by the NP.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Ben - Editor</a>
    Ben - Editor
    October 9th, 2008 @00:07 #
     
    Top

    12 people? 12 people?? Now it's my turn to take offense!

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://fionasnyckers.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Fiona</a>
    Fiona
    October 9th, 2008 @11:03 #
     
    Top

    I'm indignant on your behalf, Helen. I read the review and what particularly riled me was the unmistakable sub-text that reads something like, "What's all this, a WOMAN co-authoring a book on cricket? Who does she think she is?" Bloody cheek!

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://louisgreenberg.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Louis Greenberg</a>
    Louis Greenberg
    October 9th, 2008 @11:51 #
     
    Top

    I agree. It took a quick internet search for me to find out what a knowledgeable and expert someone Helen is - it's a two-minute exercise the reviewer could have troubled to perform before casting aspersions that end up more uncomplimentary to him than to Helen.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://margieorford.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Margie</a>
    Margie
    October 9th, 2008 @12:10 #
     
    Top

    Its just not cricket, all of this M&G non-googling and sulky sniping.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://henriettaroseinnes.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Henrietta</a>
    Henrietta
    October 9th, 2008 @12:32 #
     
    Top

    Never mind Helen writing to the M&G - they should come to THIS forum to defend themselves from US! How aggravating for you, Helen, to have this great labour of love so carelessly handled.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://www.moxyland.com" rel="nofollow">Lauren Beukes</a>
    Lauren Beukes
    October 9th, 2008 @13:35 #
     
    Top

    Hmph, if I could log onto the M&G site (the click here to log in button doesn't work) I would comment on the story there.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://sarahlotz.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Sarah Lotz</a>
    Sarah Lotz
    October 9th, 2008 @14:42 #
     
    Top

    The 'cashing in' inference is very insulting. Sorry, Helen. Even though you've scuppered the review's assertions, I know it probably still leaves a nasty taste (see how effortlessly I mix my metaphors? if only you could edit my posts.)

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://liesljobson.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Liesl</a>
    Liesl
    October 9th, 2008 @15:26 #
     
    Top

    Bit shabby, Drew Forrest.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://margieorford.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Margie</a>
    Margie
    October 9th, 2008 @16:10 #
     
    Top

    Who is Drew Forrest, by the way?

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://helenmoffett.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Helen</a>
    Helen
    October 9th, 2008 @16:38 #
     
    Top

    Deputy-editor of the M&G, apparently. Elinor Sisulu rang me asking how someone in that position has managed to escape knowing who I am (very sweet of her). She added that if the tone of his piece is anything to go by, he probably thinks women aren't newsworthy unless sex is involved.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://bentrovato.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Ben Trovato</a>
    Ben Trovato
    October 9th, 2008 @17:13 #
     
    Top

    He's a humourless hack who started censoring my column when it appeared in the M&G a few years back, forcing me to saddle up my high horse and ride on over to the Cape Times.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://karinamagdalenaszczurek.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Karina</a>
    Karina
    October 9th, 2008 @17:19 #
     
    Top

    Ben, it must have been the greatest loss that the M&G ever experienced.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://bentrovato.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Ben Trovato</a>
    Ben Trovato
    October 9th, 2008 @17:44 #
     
    Top

    Thanks, Karina. You're absolutely right. It reminds me of Decca Records' decision not to sign The Beatles.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://margieorford.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Margie</a>
    Margie
    October 9th, 2008 @18:08 #
     
    Top

    Ben, I am glad to see that your delusions of grandeur have not abandoned you in your hour of need!

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://bentrovato.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Ben Trovato</a>
    Ben Trovato
    October 9th, 2008 @20:21 #
     
    Top

    Cheeky wench.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://margieorford.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Margie</a>
    Margie
    October 9th, 2008 @20:54 #
     
    Top

    If there are wenches on the benches then it must be cricket...

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://helenmoffett.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Helen</a>
    Helen
    October 9th, 2008 @23:17 #
     
    Top

    Thanks all for making what might have been a rather sticky wicket so very entertaining. You are all a joy and delight. May your books sell like hot cakes (or should that be spuds?).

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Ben - Editor</a>
    Ben - Editor
    October 26th, 2008 @21:35 #
     
    Top

    Fiona, I haven't been able to find Helen's missive to the M&G online, but there is a strong riposte from Bob Woolmer's wife Gill here:

    http://www.mg.co.za/article/2008-10-17-october-17-to-23-2008

    Scroll down a bit until you see "Drew conclusions".

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://helenmoffett.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Helen</a>
    Helen
    October 26th, 2008 @22:47 #
     
    Top

    Thanks, Hugh, and Fiona, and all you merry folk. Now let me fill you in on how the saga unfolded (it was quite an innings). Once I'd vented on Book SA, I felt happy to head for the pavilion, esp as Tim Noakes (my co-author) was relaxing in the Okavango Swamps, far from all things electronic.

    But no, I calculated without my friends -- one in particular, who yelled at me until I agreed to defend myself in print. (It was an interesting moment of psychic discovery -- I truly don't care what strangers think of me, the hallmark of eccentricity, apparently.) So I wrote a letter, as did Gill Woolmer. The M&G first printed a somewhat toned-down version of hers, but not mine. Fair enough, we live in interesting times and the Letters page is pretty crowded -- but that didn't explain why my letter wasn't published in the M&G online.

    By now Tim Noakes had returned from Paradise -- a small mushroom cloud went up. A similar explosion came from my oldest friend, jetting into CT for the weekend, who said I had been defamed, I was a freelancer, my rep was beyond rubies, and my right of reply had been denied. (She's a top-drawer lawyer.) Then came my parents -- "uncalled-for libel". Lawyer friend insisted I write to the press ombudsman, as did Tim, who co-signed, although we settled for the M&G ombudsman.

    Next was a very friendly e-mail from Shaun de Waal, who I've always admired. Apologies, they should have published my response, but thought Gill's letter would be enough. They'd print my letter, but I could have only 350 words. I pointed out mildly that their deputy editor had had rather more than 350 words in which to be snide about me and a book he hadn't read properly. Fair enough, sez Shaun, but given the State of the Nation, they could really only spare me 350 words -- but they'd run my original letter in full on the website, AND rerun Gill's original letter sans cuts. Done, sez I. He even sent me the final edited copy (you all know how rare this is) of my short ball (a vicious bouncer), with the added bonus of a deadly yorker from Elinor Sisulu, who taken issue with the "misogynistic arrogance" of a reviewer who clearly thought a woman had no business writing a cricket book.

    All good and well. So I was very tickled to find that the M&G had published my letter in full, even though it's 600 words, AND run it alongside a pic of the book! Plus we now have the website advertised as well -- ahahahaha. Elinor's snorter never made it to final copy (I'd be interested to know who made the decision to run the page in its final form), but hey, justice was served.

    Here's my delivery:

    http://www.mg.co.za/article/2008-10-24-october-24-to-30-2008

    (Ben, please make the link talk!) Scroll down until you reach "It's called teamwork". PS: Book SA friends get a double bonus, as another of our clan is whacking away at Stephen Gray in the same space! Ben and Book SA are hailed as freedom fighters along the way...

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://helenmoffett.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Helen</a>
    Helen
    October 26th, 2008 @22:59 #
     
    Top

    "who HAD taken issue" (everyone who has ever been edited by me is now allowed to dance with glee).

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://fionasnyckers.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Fiona</a>
    Fiona
    October 27th, 2008 @09:13 #
     
    Top

    Thanks for these links, Ben and Helen. I read both letters with great interest and appreciation. They should set the record straight.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://louisgreenberg.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Louis Greenberg</a>
    Louis Greenberg
    October 27th, 2008 @10:13 #
     
    Top

    Well done, Helen, and Shaun too. This is a lesson in non-violent conflict resolution.

    And Helen, not caring about what strangers think of you - I imagine, because I can only wish I suffered the same eccentricity - is a sign of maturity, balance and a coherent sense of self. You should lead workshops - particularly for politicians and writers.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://www.moxyland.com" rel="nofollow">Lauren Beukes</a>
    Lauren Beukes
    October 27th, 2008 @11:34 #
     
    Top

    Well done, Helen. Few conquering heroes defending their honour have done so with such articulate arguments and good humour.

    Bottom

Please register or log in to comment


» View comments as a forum thread and add tags in BOOK Chat