Sign up

Login to BooksLIVE

Forgotten password?

Forgotten your password?

Enter your username or email address and we'll send you reset instructions

Books LIVE

BooksLIVESA

Marga Ley ontmoet @Jeffrey_Archer en meen hy's 'n "aangenaam-arrogante heer": http://t.co/OOAPEPko

JM Coetzee Reviews Strange Attractors by Sarah Glaz and JoAnne Growney

Strange AttractorsVerdict: carrot

Here’s something you don’t see very often: a book review by Nobel laureate JM Coetzee. Not unsurprisingly, it’s come to BOOK SA via an unusual vector, the Notices of the American Mathematical Society.

Under Coetzee’s unwavering eye: Strange Attractors: Poems of Love and Mathematics, a compilation of 150 poems informed by “number theory, the infinitesimal calculus, and the mathematics of indeterminacy” – and possibly even some trig, shudder – whose common theme is love. Coetzee-spotters will know that the author once created a computer programme that generated poetry (and was not displeased with the results), so he’s in his element here.

His extended verdict is that there are “no duds among the poems, but overall they tend to be witty rather than profound”. Our extended verdict is “how utterly delightful to have dug this up”:

The highest type of intelligence, says Aristotle, manifests itself in an ability to see connections where no one has seen them before, that is, to think analogically. The spark of true poetr —according to one influential school of poets—flashes when ideas are juxtaposed that no one has yet thought of bringing together. Scientific discoveries often start with a hunch that there is some connection between apparently unrelated phenomena.

So there are a priori grounds for thinking of poetry and mathematics together, as two rarefied forms of symbolic activity based on the power of the human mind to detect hidden analogies. In other words, an anthology like Strange Attractors, which brings together a hundred and fifty poems with some degree of mathematical content, makes more a priori sense than, say, a collection of famous speeches with some mathematical content.

Book Details

 

Recent comments:

  • <a href="http://margieorford.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Margie</a>
    Margie
    August 11th, 2009 @10:23 #
     
    Top

    I like this: “ overall they tend to be witty rather than profound”. Is this good? is this bad? ARe wits preferable to the profound? Whom would one choose on a desert island? for a marriage partner? for a resident poet? The witty are always good in moments of illness and loss as they make you laugh just as your heart breaks. Or is it that they break your heart by making you laugh. The profound are not helpful on shopping trips or holidays as they don't help you carry heavy things - bags, children, cold beers - because they are busy pondering what would be the best way to carry the above, or bring them up or try to delve into psychic wounds that might have resulted in incessant back-seat fighting. But still, the profound do have a place. it is just that profundity can get on a busy woman's nerves

    Bottom

Please register or log in to comment


» View comments as a forum thread and add tags in BOOK Chat