Sign up

Login to BooksLIVE

Forgotten password?

Forgotten your password?

Enter your username or email address and we'll send you reset instructions

Books LIVE

BooksLIVESA

Marga Ley ontmoet @Jeffrey_Archer en meen hy's 'n "aangenaam-arrogante heer": http://t.co/OOAPEPko

Ikhide R Ikheloa’s Wainainaesque “Email from America” Slams 2011 Caine Prize Shortlist

Nigerian-born Ikhide R Ikheloa has written an “Email from America”, in the style of Binyavanga Wainaina’s satirical “How to Write About Africa” (only, it must be said, less humourous), which slams the 2011 Caine Prize for African Writing shortlist, calling the shortlisted stories “lazy” and “predictable”. Although acknowledging the benefits of the Caine Prize more generally, Ikheloa argues that this year provides us with examples of “How Not to Write About Africa”, revealing only the continent’s stereotypes and detailing her “every open sore”.

One can’t help thinking that Ikheloa’s reactionary piece reaches beyond the five shortlisted stories to something much larger. With nearly 130 entries from all over Africa chosen by a panel of reputable judges, there must be more than “orthodoxy and mediocrity” embedded in these tales. What do you think?

The Caine Prize for African Writing has been great for African literature by showcasing some truly good works by African writers. The good news is that the Caine Prize is here to stay. The bad news is that someone is going to win the Caine Prize this year. This is a shame; having read the stories on the shortlist, I conclude that a successful African writer must be clinically depressed, chronicling in excruciating detail every open sore of Africa. Apologies to Wole Soyinka. The creation of a prize for “African writing” may have created the unintended effect of breeding writers willing to stereotype Africa for glory.

The mostly lazy, predictable stories that made the 2011 shortlist celebrate orthodoxy and mediocrity. They are a riot of exhausted clichés even as ancient conflicts and anxieties fade into the past tense: huts, moons, rapes, wars, and poverty. The monotony of misery simply overwhelms the reader. Fiammetta Rocco, the Economist’s literary editor who chaired last year’s judges, crows that the stories are “uniquely powerful.” The stories are uniquely wretched. The chair of this year’s judges Hisham Matar declares presumptuously that the stories “represent a portrait of today’s African short story: its wit and intelligence, its concerns and preoccupations.” Really? Is this the sum total of our experience, this humourless, tasteless canvas of shiftless Stepin Fetchit suffering?

Book details


Scribd.com book preview:

The Mistress’s Dog: Short Stories 1996 – 2010


Scribd.com book preview:

The Bed Book of Short Stories

Photo of Bulawayo courtesy Cornell.edu & Lamwaka courtesy My Little Camera2005

 

Recent comments:

  • <a href="http://www.darlingtonrichards.com/" rel="nofollow">moi</a>
    moi
    May 24th, 2011 @12:16 #
     
    Top

    I realise accuracy has little place in ringing rhetoric, but the lament:

    "The creation of a prize for “African writing” may have created the unintended effect of breeding writers willing to stereotype Africa for glory."

    does suppose the short-listees all wrote their stories specifically as entrants for the Caine. Which was not the case.

    These stories were all writ and published in vastly diverse collections elsewhere and only later selected as entrants for the CP. Surely any 'viewing [of] Africa through a very narrow prism' on the part of the judges who selected them?

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://helenmoffett.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Helen</a>
    Helen
    May 24th, 2011 @12:25 #
     
    Top

    Seeking controversy, I think. Not so much in his claim that prizes to African writers are only given if they present the stereotypes of the suffering continent -- this is something that unsettles me a little with every Caine prize shortlist I've read in recent memory -- but in picking this particular list as a target. If he wanted to make this argument, it applied possibly more so to last year's list, and the year before, and the year before etc. I also wish the shortlist didn't feature refugee camps, feral children, incest, rape, war, starvation, dread disease, slavery (admittedly always exquisitely written) with quite such regularity -- one reason I was so pleased when Henrietta R-I won in 2008 with a speculative piece that had global resonance. But this year's list shows a marked shift in that a frankly humorous story (Lauri's) has made the cut. I don't think Ikheloa gets the multiple ironies of her story -- his comment here perhaps reveals his one of his own blind spots (men are not to be mocked).

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://rustumkozain.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Rustum Kozain</a>
    Rustum Kozain
    May 24th, 2011 @13:02 #
     
    Top

    Strangely, I've recently been wondering about whether to include cellphones, Twitter and Facebook in stories...

    I think maybe this guy is just ramping up publicity for his favourite author, trying to influence the judges.

    Bottom

Please register or log in to comment


» View comments as a forum thread and add tags in BOOK Chat