Books LIVE Community Sign up

Login to BooksLIVE

Forgotten password?

Forgotten your password?

Enter your username or email address and we'll send you reset instructions

Books LIVE

Mike van Graan: “We Are All Oscar Pistorius”

 
Blade RunnerTheatre in Translation Vol IMike van Graan, playwright and Executive Director of the African Arts Institute, sees the murder charge against Oscar Pistorius as a metaphor for the current state of South Africa – a country that achieved a “miracle” transformation and was united by sporting achievements such as the 1995 Rugby World Cup but is now facing challenges such as racial tension, violence, inequality and corruption.

As with Pistorius, Van Graan writes in The Guardian, the warning signs for South Africa are there, but if it is covered up and not addressed, tensions will continue to erupt, as evidences by the Marikana shooting. “We are all Oscar Pistorius. Oscar Pistorius is us. What a terrifying thought,” he says.

In a recent conversation with a cartoonist, he suggested that his daily work had changed from providing insights into our lived reality through over-the-top images, to toning down our over-the-top reality for a baffled and battered citizenry, through light relief.

Artists, cartoonists and writers often use metaphors to provide insights into the state of our society or some aspect of it. While President Jacob Zuma’s halting, unconvincing delivery of his state of the nation address was an apt metaphor in itself for the government’s poor delivery of its oft-repeated “better-life-for-all” promises, it was Oscar Pistorius who provided the best “state-of-the-nation” metaphor on the very day that the president opened parliament.

Book details

Images courtesy Wereld Journalisten and Times LIVE

 

Recent comments:

  • <a href="http://kelwynsole.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Kelwyn Sole</a>
    Kelwyn Sole
    February 21st, 2013 @21:47 #
     
    Top

    Interesting article, but why oh why, yet again, the current SA fashion of the royal 'we'? I for one am getting rather tired of being included in writers' 'we's' - and there are others, I think, feel the same. Speak for yourself.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://helenmoffett.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Helen</a>
    Helen
    February 22nd, 2013 @23:31 #
     
    Top

    Good piece, Mike. I wish the Graniad had chosen a better pic to illustrate it though -- or a pic that didn't have a T-shirt featuring a arch-patriarch on it.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://kelwynsole.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Kelwyn Sole</a>
    Kelwyn Sole
    February 24th, 2013 @12:26 #
     
    Top

    I think the worry for me is that there's a mode of analytic discourse very active in SA at the moment, in a number of fields. For want of a better way of looking at it, let's call it the 'we are all to blame' discourse. Imo it is a direct offshoot of the clerical discourse that too many people accepted as part of the (very flawed) TRC process.
    As far as I can see, this discourse is attempting to address issues of complicitcy, and compel people to agency..."can't you see you're part of this? Why don't you do something about it?"
    Trouble is, on closer examination it's deficient as structural analysis - because the rubric that accompanies the 'we' and the behaviours 'we' possess is in hugely broad sweeps. It's also deficient as a form of suggestion for future agency.
    Logically, if everyone's guilty, then no one's guilty. It actually bleaches agency from actual perpetrators.
    Finally, it addresses in a deficient manner the problem of social ventriloquism in SA; the vexed question of who should, or can, speak on behalf of others.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://www.annetownsend.co.za" rel="nofollow">Anne Townsend</a>
    Anne Townsend
    February 24th, 2013 @14:41 #
     
    Top

    'It's also deficient as a form of suggestion for future agency' - yes, very true!

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://ffeathers.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">Sarah Maddox</a>
    Sarah Maddox
    February 27th, 2013 @22:04 #
     
    Top

    From the point of view of people living outside South Africa (I'm in Australia at the moment) the debate around Oscar Pistorius seems to be reaching the heights of depersonalisation. (Horrid word, sorry.) Do people in SA have the same feeling? In Sydney we seem to be talking overwhelmingly about the gun culture in SA, probably because we were so recently talking about the same in the US. Yet there must be so much more involved in the Pistorius case, and in the sad situation those two people found themselves in that night. I guess it's inevitable that a celebrity will attract such attention. And it's valuable for us all to examine our societies, both inside and outside SA. Sydney is starting to talk about its own gun violence now too. But I'm wondering how possible it will be for Pistorius to have a fair trial. How does that seem to people in the country?

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://kelwynsole.book.co.za" rel="nofollow">Kelwyn Sole</a>
    Kelwyn Sole
    February 28th, 2013 @09:45 #
     
    Top

    I feel a little uncomfortable saying this, as at the moment I have no sympathy at all with either party; but one of the issues that is coming up in people's minds - as far as I can gather - is caused by the chance occurrence of the Pistorius case and the Booysen case more or less at the same time. They appear, for now, to address to some extent the same broad issue - abuse of women (I am not suggesting they are exactly the same!). But there is the question hanging over this of how justice is meted out to people with hugely different amounts of money and spin; and the ongoing issue of how the media handles both.

    Bottom
  • <a href="http://www.annetownsend.co.za" rel="nofollow">Anne Townsend</a>
    Anne Townsend
    March 10th, 2013 @14:10 #
     
    Top

    Sarah, I can't think of a story less deserving of the term 'depersonalisation'. Maybe because I'm half-Afrikaans, maybe because my mother's maiden name was Steenkamp, or maybe because Oscar feels so familiar, as many famous people do, this story has penerated my defences like few other news stories. As for how it affects 'people in the country' it depends which 'people'. Certainly the ones I've discussed it with are horrified, saddened, they feel it's a ghastly story with an unfolding tragedy for both families. Many couples have hideous fights (and no, Valentine's Day does not guarantee bliss...) but if there had been no guns in the house....

    Bottom

Please register or log in to comment


» View comments as a forum thread and add tags in BOOK Chat